PulseAugur
实时 08:31:01
English(EN) Anthropic is physically destroying RARE and OLD books to train Claude

Anthropic被指为AI训练销毁珍贵书籍,引发众怒

据报道,Anthropic公司为训练其Claude大语言模型而销毁珍贵旧书,此举被一些人比作焚书。该公司据称购买了数百万本二手书,使用工业设备扫描其页面,然后丢弃实体书。虽然一位法官裁定扫描过程属于合理使用,但销毁这些实体文物引发了广泛批评,有人将其比作反人类战争罪和亚历山大图书馆被焚毁。埃隆·马斯克表示xAI不会使用被销毁的书籍进行训练,Codeberg等平台已禁止LLM代码,并呼吁进行适当的署名和同意。 AI

影响 这场争议凸显了AI数据获取中的伦理问题,可能影响未来的数据来源实践和监管审查。

排序理由 该条目是对Anthropic涉嫌为AI训练销毁书籍的评论,引用了批评意见和与历史上的焚书事件的比较。

在 dev.to — LLM tag 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

Anthropic被指为AI训练销毁珍贵书籍,引发众怒

本文如何被排名

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Commentary
该条目是对Anthropic涉嫌为AI训练销毁书籍的评论,引用了批评意见和与历史上的焚书事件的比较。
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
other
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
Standard
On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness
31 days old
Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准

报道来源 [1]

  1. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Andrei Merlescu ·

    Anthropic 正在物理销毁稀有旧书以训练 Claude

    <p>It hit the news that AI companies were destroying <strong>rare books</strong> in an effort to ingest the data that they <em>claim to own.</em> </p> <p><a class="article-body-image-wrapper" href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity…