English(EN) Or, leaving # AI out of the picture, if you're adding type checkers, linters, software design patterns, peer reviewing, etc etc to a software project in a scrip

作者认为脚本语言可能不适合复杂的工具

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-07-28 07:36

作者认为，将类型检查器和linter等复杂的软件开发工具添加到Python、Ruby或PHP等脚本语言中，可能会抵消它们的优势。这些语言通常更适合简单的流程，试图强迫它们表现得像静态类型语言可能会适得其反。因此，建议开发人员如果项目需要这些工具，应该选择那些从根本上为这些工具设计的语言。 AI

排序理由该条目是一篇讨论软件开发实践和语言选择的观点文章。

在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →

观点

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

报道来源 [1]

Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] · 2026-07-28 07:36

Or, leaving # AI out of the picture, if you're adding type checkers, linters, software design patterns, peer reviewing, etc etc to a software project in a scrip

Or, leaving # AI out of the picture, if you're adding type checkers, linters, software design patterns, peer reviewing, etc etc to a software project in a scripting language, the choice for that language is probably not the right one. Python, Ruby, PHP etc have a lot of strenghts…

报道来源 [1]

Or, leaving # AI out of the picture, if you're adding type checkers, linters, software design patterns, peer reviewing, etc etc to a software project in a scrip

相关实体

相关话题