法院裁定用户对其与 ChatGPT 的对话没有权利，认为他们是自己数据的“非当事人”。这一裁决是 OpenAI 版权案的一部分，法院命令保存所有 ChatGPT 的输出日志，即使是用户已删除的。一些用户试图介入以保护他们的私人对话，但他们的反对被驳回。 AI
影响 这项裁决可能会影响用户对隐私的期望以及 AI 生成内容的 डेटा所有权。
排序理由 关于 AI 对话中用户数据隐私的法院裁决。[lever_c_demoted from significant: ic=2 ai=0.4]
在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 2 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
🤖 Users tried to object to their chatgpt logs being handed to the NYT. the court ruled they were "non-parties" to their own conversations. in the openai copyright case, a court ordered every chatgpt output log preserved, including chats people had deleted. some users tried to int…
🤖 users tried to object to their chatgpt logs being handed to the NYT. the court ruled they were "non-parties" to their own conversations. in the openai copyright case, a court ordered every chatgpt output log preserved, including chats people had deleted. some users tried to int…