有用户据称使用ChatGPT证伪了Dinitz-Garg-Goemans猜想。该说法表明，经过几个小时和几次提示词的交互，该AI模型能够证明该数学猜想的错误。 AI
影响 这一轶事报告表明LLM在数学研究中具有潜力，但仍需验证。
排序理由 该说法是关于AI能力的用户的报告，而非官方公告或已验证的研究。
在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
ChatGPT据称证伪Dinitz-Garg-Goemans猜想
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 该说法是关于AI能力的用户的报告，而非官方公告或已验证的研究。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Standard
- On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
- Story freshness
- 69 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
这是新现实吗？！🤔 在 #ChatGPT 中输入几个提示几小时后……Dinitz-Garg-Goemans猜想被证伪。🤯😱😔 https:// nitter.net/Dmitr
Is this a new reality?! 🤔 A few hours and a few prompts in # ChatGPT later, and... ...the Dinitz-Garg-Goemans conjecture is false. 🤯😱😔 https:// nitter.net/DmitryRybin1/status /2079904005652893709 # math # LLM # AI # FML