PulseAugur
实时 20:43:52
English(EN) RE: https:// frontrange.co/@apnewsbot/11695 8859917480834 $3,000/per book seems like very little to me for the value of their labor and its future value to the

作者的人工智能劳动价值在每本书 3000 美元的赔偿辩论中受到质疑

作者在训练人工智能模型中的智力和创造性劳动的价值被低估了,一个具体案例提到每本书 3000 美元的赔偿不足。这种观点认为,像Anthropic这样的人工智能公司依赖作者的作品作为其产品的根本基础,而不是仅仅将其视为输入。 AI

影响 引发了对为人工智能发展提供动力的创作者获得公平报酬的质疑。

排序理由 该条目讨论了对人工智能训练中劳动价值的看法,而非直接事件。

在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

作者的人工智能劳动价值在每本书 3000 美元的赔偿辩论中受到质疑

报道来源 [1]

  1. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    RE: https:// frontrange.co/@apnewsbot/11695 8859917480834 $3,000/per book seems like very little to me for the value of their labor and its future value to the

    RE: https:// frontrange.co/@apnewsbot/11695 8859917480834 $3,000/per book seems like very little to me for the value of their labor and its future value to the company. Anthropic would not have been able to "train" its AI without the authors' intellectual and creative efforts. It…