一部根据法律要求公开披露其使用AI的韩剧并未面临重大抵制。尽管该剧在西方国家（据报道反AI情绪高涨）名列前茅，但并未出现针对该剧的公开抱怨或指责。这种缺乏批评的现象引发了对潜在双重标准的质疑，特别是与对其他情境下AI使用所产生的反应相比。 AI
影响 凸显了不同媒体和地区对AI采纳的公众和行业反应可能存在的不一致性。
排序理由 该集群讨论了公众对媒体中使用AI的反应，将其定性为关于潜在双重标准的观点文章，而不是直接发布或政策变更。
在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 2 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
So, if done right and/or #AI use was less than 30% (guesstimate), it is okay now? No shaming? No cancellation? No witch-hunt? No defamation? Or, there's double-standards? Because they enjoyed the #Kdrama , they ignored the production used AI? Or because there's no specific person…
A certain #Kdrama used #AI (they also publicly disclosed it, which is required in Korean Law) but I have yet to see a single complaint. What's interesting is, the Western (AU, EU, NA) world is silent about it even though it's topping their charts. (The West has the highest number…