English(EN) Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms GLM-5.2 in coding and costs slightly less

Meta的Muse Spark 1.1在编码方面超越GLM-5.2，降低成本和幻觉

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-07-11 08:28

Meta的Muse Spark 1.1取得了显著进步，在人工智能指数中得分为51，在编码能力方面得分71.3，实现了显著飞跃。新版本在编码任务中优于GLM-5.2，每任务成本降至0.26美元。此外，Muse Spark 1.1的幻觉率从73%大幅降至38%。 AI

影响为编码性能和成本效益设定了新标杆，可能给GLM-5.2等竞争对手带来压力。

排序理由前沿实验室模型发布，包含性能指标和成本比较。[lever_c_demoted from frontier_release: ic=1 ai=1.0]

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Significant; 前沿实验室模型发布，包含性能指标和成本比较。[lever_c_demoted from frontier_release: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: model release, product; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 89 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

The Decoder TIER_1 English(EN) · Matthias Bastian · 2026-07-11 08:28

Meta的Muse Spark 1.1在编码方面优于GLM-5.2，成本略低

<p><img alt="" class="attachment-full size-full wp-post-image" height="768" src="https://the-decoder.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/meta_AI_logo.png" style="height: auto; margin-bottom: 10px;" width="1376" /></p> <p> Meta's Muse Spark 1.1 scored 51 on the Artificial Analysis Inte…