English(EN) Why I'm a moral anti-realist but may be unable to convince you

哲学家们争论知识辩护的合理性，倾向于基础主义

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-07-08 15:23

哲学家们争论知识如何被辩护，基础主义、融贯论、无限主义和怀疑论是主要的几种方法。基础主义认为某些信念无需理由即可被认识，是哲学家中最流行的观点。作者讨论了现象保守主义，这是基础主义的一种形式，它认为如果某事看起来是真的，那么它就为相信它提供了理由，除非有理由怀疑它。 AI

排序理由该条目是一篇讨论哲学认识论和知识辩护理论的观点文章。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 该条目是一篇讨论哲学认识论和知识辩护理论的观点文章。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: opinion, other; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: Low; Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
Story freshness: 92 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

LessWrong (AI tag) TIER_1 English(EN) · Nina Panickssery · 2026-07-08 15:23

我为何是道德反实在论者，却可能无法说服你

<figure class="image image_resized" style="width: 62.2356495468278%;"><img alt="image.png" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/lesswrong-2-0/image/upload/v1783524096/lexical_client_uploads/o6atggyocc0s5pu7oh3l.png" /><figcaption><p><span>Figure from Chapter 4 of Understanding Knowled…