PulseAugur
实时 23:11:25
English(EN) ECCV: Will there be another confirmation after “provisionally accepted”? [D]

ECCV论文录用延迟惹恼研究人员,急需官方确认

欧洲计算机视觉会议(ECCV)的论文录用通知出现延迟,令研究人员感到沮丧。尽管作者们几周前已提交了最终可编辑版本,但仍未收到正式的录用通知。这种不明确的确认阻碍了注册、签证申请、差旅规划和资金申请等关键的行政任务,导致与会者普遍感到不满。 AI

排序理由 该集群讨论的是学术会议中与论文录用相关的程序性问题,属于研究范畴。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.4]

在 r/MachineLearning 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

ECCV论文录用延迟惹恼研究人员,急需官方确认

本文如何被排名

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Tool
该集群讨论的是学术会议中与论文录用相关的程序性问题,属于研究范畴。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.4]
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
paper
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
Standard
On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness
63 days old
Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准

报道来源 [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/National-Resident244 ·

    ECCV:继“暂定接收”后是否会有进一步确认?[D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I understand that it may not be appropriate to call it “officially accepted” yet because of the wording used in the notification, and I also saw on Twitter/X that they said they are working on it.</p> <p>However, it has already been around three …