English(EN) Bing AI: "NO! THAT'S TOO SEXUAL!" Also Bing AI when I ask for a normal bunny girl swimming

必应AI将无伤大雅的兔女郎提示标记为过于色情

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-07-04 19:07

一位Reddit用户分享了必应AI将一个“兔女郎游泳”的提示标记为过于色情的经历，尽管该提示似乎是无伤大雅的。用户提供了详细的提示，描述了一个卡通兔女郎在一个充满活力的游泳场景中，带有电影般的灯光和水下元素，最后是一个她喝苏打水的场景。AI的拒绝凸显了内容过滤器可能过于敏感或误解内容。 AI

影响凸显了AI内容审核系统及其对用户提示的解读可能存在的问题。

排序理由用户生成内容，突出了AI对内容过滤器的感知上的过度敏感或误读。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Meme; 用户生成内容，突出了AI对内容过滤器的感知上的过度敏感或误读。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: other; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: Standard; On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness: 96 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/StableDiffusion TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/HuckleberryCharacter · 2026-07-04 19:07

必应AI：“不！那太色情了！” 当我要求一个正常的兔女郎游泳时的必应AI

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1unha0h/bing_ai_no_thats_too_sexual_also_bing_ai_when_i/"> <img alt="Bing AI: "NO! THAT'S TOO SEXUAL!" Also Bing AI when I ask for a normal bunny girl swimming" src="https://external-preview.red…