English(EN) Rejected MICCAI paper: workshop -> journal/conference or directly journal/conference [R]

博士生寻求关于发表被拒 MICCAI 论文的建议

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-06-29 19:58

一名博士生，其论文尽管被审稿人指出具有新颖性但仍被 MICCAI 拒绝，正在寻求关于最佳发表策略的建议。他们正在考虑是修改后直接提交给期刊，还是在提交给期刊之前先在 MLCN 或 iMIMIC 等研讨会上发表。该学生目前并未攻读博士学位，正在权衡期刊发表的长期收益与研讨会“次优”的感知。 AI

排序理由该集群讨论了被拒的学术论文和发表策略，属于研究类别。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 该集群讨论了被拒的学术论文和发表策略，属于研究类别。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: paper; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 101 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/KingPowa · 2026-06-29 19:58

被拒的MICCAI论文：研讨会 -> 期刊/会议或直接投稿期刊/会议 [R]

<div class="md"><p>Premise: this work is my first year PhD, and I dropped out for personal reasons. I still want to do research but independently.</p> <p>I have tried to submit my explainability paper to MICCAI. Sadly, for doubtful/good reasons, it got rejected.</p…