一位Reddit用户首次担任数据挖掘会议的审稿人，他正在寻求关于如何处理双盲投稿的指导，而会议赛道却指定为单盲投稿。该用户不确定这些投稿是否应直接拒绝，或者是否有不同的管理协议。 AI
排序理由 该集群讨论的是关于学术论文投稿的程序性问题，而不是核心AI开发或行业事件。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
数据挖掘会议审稿人寻求关于单盲赛道中双盲投稿的指导
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 该集群讨论的是关于学术论文投稿的程序性问题，而不是核心AI开发或行业事件。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- 108 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
单盲赛道中的双盲提交 [D]
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone.</p> <p>First-time reviewer for data mining venues here.</p> <p>For the applied tracks in ICDM and KDD, the CFP states submissions should be single-blind, showing the author's name and affiliations.</p> <p>I received some submissions …