准备提交ECCV会议的研究人员正在寻求关于文件上传程序的澄清。具体来说，他们对如何包含源代码文件和最终PDF以及补充材料感到困惑，这是根据提到“supplementary_materiel”文件夹的说明得出的。 AI
排序理由 该集群讨论了与研究会议提交相关的程序性问题。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.1]
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
ECCV会议提交流程令研究人员感到困惑
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Tool
- 该集群讨论了与研究会议提交相关的程序性问题。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.1]
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- paper
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- 75 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
面向ECCV，Springer Metor。我们应该如何上传文件？[D]
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><ol> <li><p>source files + final paper pdf.</p></li> <li><p>ZIP containing the source files and final paper.pdf.</p></li> </ol> <p>Where does the supplemental materiel get uploaded? Because in that email it says include it in a "supplementary_m…