卢德运动常常被误解为反技术，但实际上它反对技术部署带来的有害社会影响，例如工人受伤和失业。Miriam A. Cherry 教授探讨了一个卢德人取得成功的另一种历史，并设想了他们对社会的潜在影响。此外，Brian Merchant 的著作《血染机器》提供了关于卢德主义及其历史背景的真实且引人入胜的记述。 AI
影响 为围绕新技术（包括人工智能）的社会影响的辩论提供了历史背景。
排序理由 该集群讨论了对卢德运动的历史解读，并引用了书籍和学术文章，符合评论类别。
在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 3 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
(Post 1 of 3) The Luddites are misunderstood. They were not against AI, computers, power looms, or other technology, they opposed those uses of technology that harmed people and communities. They didn't support businesses deploying machines and changing processes so workers were …
(Post 2 of 3) Look! Miriam A. Cherry, a professor and associate dean at Saint Louis University Law School, has published an article with the outline of an alternative history of the Luddites, called "The Future Encyclopedia of Luddism," at https:// thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/the …
(Post 3 of 3) If you're interested in a more factual, yet lively and enjoyable history of Luddism, read "Blood in the Machine," an excellent book by Brian Merchant. published in 2023 and still in print. Merchant also has a Blood in the Machine channel with weekly, insightful news…