PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 10:09:41
ไทย(TH) เจมิไน 3.8 แฟลช: เปรียบเทียบระดับการคิด ต่ำ ปานกลาง สูง พร้อมเหตุผลที่ระดับ Minimal หายไป

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash updates thinking levels, drops 'minimal' setting

Google has updated its Gemini 3.8 Flash model, introducing three distinct thinking levels: low, medium, and high. These levels control the amount of internal reasoning the model performs before responding, impacting latency, token usage, and cost. Unlike its predecessor, Gemini 3.7 Flash, the 3.8 Flash model defaults to the medium setting and no longer supports the 'minimal' thinking level, which has been mapped to 'low' for migration purposes. Developers are advised to explicitly set the thinking level for each use case to manage costs and performance effectively. AI

IMPACT New thinking level controls in Gemini 3.8 Flash offer developers more granular management of cost and performance for different tasks.

RANK_REASON Model release from a frontier lab (Google). [lever_c_demoted from frontier_release: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on dev.to — LLM tag →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

Google Gemini 3.8 Flash updates thinking levels, drops 'minimal' setting

How we ranked this

Signal score
58 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Significant
Model release from a frontier lab (Google). [lever_c_demoted from frontier_release: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
model release, product
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
Breaking (< 6h)
Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

Full methodology in our editorial standards.

COVERAGE [1]

  1. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 ไทย(TH) · Thanawat Wongchai ·

    Gemini 3.8 Flash: Comparing Thinking Levels Low, Medium, High with Reasons for the Absence of the Minimal Level

    <h1> ตั้งค่า <code>thinking_level</code> ของ Gemini 3.8 Flash ให้เหมาะกับแต่ละเส้นทาง </h1> <p>Gemini 3.8 Flash มีระดับการคิดสามระดับ ได้แก่ <code>low</code>, <code>medium</code> และ <code>high</code> การตั้งค่านี้ควบคุมปริมาณการให้เหตุผลภายในก่อนโมเดลตอบกลับ และส่งผลโดยตรงต่อควา…