PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 04:07:05

NeurIPS review period sees widespread silence from reviewers and authors

The NeurIPS conference review period has been unusually quiet, with many reviewers and authors becoming unresponsive. Some reviewers have gone silent after initial feedback, while authors are also failing to submit rebuttals or even withdraw their papers. This lack of engagement has led to speculation about authors submitting papers to multiple venues without commitment, or a general disinterest in the review process. AI

RANK_REASON User-generated commentary on a conference's review process.

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

NeurIPS review period sees widespread silence from reviewers and authors

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/RevolutionaryPea8272 ·

    Completely dead NeurIPS review period from both ends? [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I’ve seen a lot of people whose reviewers went silent after initial reviews, but I am also noting abnormally quiet authors. I ultimately withdrew my paper, but stayed an active reviewer. Out of my batch of 4 papers, one withdrew, one posted a reb…