PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 04:05:00

NeurIPS Review Process: Do Area Chairs Provide Scores?

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

This post on r/MachineLearning discusses the role of Area Chairs (ACs) in the NeurIPS conference review process. The original poster, a first-time submitter, is inquiring whether ACs are expected to provide ratings during the author-reviewer discussion phase, as they have received a meta-review but no comments from the AC yet. AI

RANK_REASON The cluster discusses a procedural question about a conference review process, not a new release or significant event.

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

NeurIPS Review Process: Do Area Chairs Provide Scores?

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Living_Interview_638 ·

    Do ACs also give scores? [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>This is my first time submitting to NeurIPS.<br /> Are ACs also supposed to give ratings during the Phase 2 (author-reviewer discussion session)? </p> <p>I have received the meta-review, but have not received any comments from the AC yet, and was…

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS