PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 02:53:18

ML researcher asks about linking figures in NeurIPS rebuttal

A user on the r/MachineLearning subreddit is seeking advice on whether to include links to plots and figures in their rebuttal for the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). While the official website technically disallows links, the user believes figures would be more digestible than tables for presenting additional experiments. They are concerned about the potential consequences, ranging from a minor reprimand to outright rejection, and are asking for past experiences from others who may have taken a similar risk. AI

RANK_REASON User query about a procedural aspect of a conference submission.

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

ML researcher asks about linking figures in NeurIPS rebuttal

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/confirm-jannati ·

    Link plots/figures in NeurIPS rebuttal [R]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Reviewers requested additional experiments. In table format, I fear the results would not be as digestible as in a figure/plot. Links are &quot;technically&quot; not allowed as per the official website, but for those with experience, can/should I…