PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 19:57:57

NeurIPS paper submission: User seeks advice on rebuttal process

By PulseAugur Editorial · [1 sources] ·

A user on the r/MachineLearning subreddit is seeking advice on the rebuttal process for a position paper submitted to the NeurIPS conference. They received scores of 3/3/5/7 and are looking for guidance on how to effectively address reviewer feedback, whether scores can be changed, and who the rebuttal is intended to convince. AI

RANK_REASON User query about a conference submission process, not a direct announcement or finding.

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

NeurIPS paper submission: User seeks advice on rebuttal process

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Empty-Avocado5927 ·

    Neurips Position Track Rebuttal and Reviews [R]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hello! This is my first time submitting an actual conference paper (only done workshops so far).</p> <p>Got a 3/3/5/7 for the Position Paper Track. Reviews all seem quite addressable. Meta review also seemed kinda positive? Included wording such …

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS