English(EN) I know it's easy to dismiss the AI lets non-programmers code, but we've had this the 1980s: Lotus 123 let the financial teams in an organisation write code in t

作者警告：AI代码生成重现了20世纪80年代电子表格的风险

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-05-17 10:41

作者将当前允许非程序员编写代码的AI工具与20世纪80年代的Lotus 1-2-3等电子表格软件进行了类比。在承认这些工具能够赋能个人的同时，作者指出，用它们构建的复杂系统，例如财务团队使用的电子表格，可能会容易出错，甚至污染科学研究。这种历史视角表明，对LLM生成代码的长期影响和可靠性应持谨慎态度。 AI

影响将AI代码生成与历史软件进行类比，暗示了潜在的长期风险和可靠性问题。

排序理由该条目是一篇评论文章，将AI代码生成与历史电子表格软件进行比较，提出了批判性观点。

在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

报道来源 [1]

Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] · 2026-05-17 10:41

I know it's easy to dismiss the AI lets non-programmers code, but we've had this the 1980s: Lotus 123 let the financial teams in an organisation write code in t

I know it's easy to dismiss the AI lets non-programmers code, but we've had this the 1980s: Lotus 123 let the financial teams in an organisation write code in the form of spreadsheets. And now companies absolutely depend on those tables. But - i know an accountant whose companies…

报道来源 [1]

I know it's easy to dismiss the AI lets non-programmers code, but we've had this the 1980s: Lotus 123 let the financial teams in an organisation write code in t

相关实体

相关话题