PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 17:08:18

New benchmarks and safety methods emerge for advanced LLM agents

New research explores the development and evaluation of AI agents, focusing on their ability to navigate complex environments and adhere to policies. StarDojo benchmarks agent performance in open-ended simulations like Stardew Valley, revealing limitations in visual understanding and reasoning. CostBench evaluates LLM agents on cost-optimal planning and adaptation in dynamic travel-planning scenarios, showing significant gaps in economic reasoning. Other papers introduce methods for simulating individuals using LLM agents grounded in self-reports, developing symbolic communication for efficient multi-agent reasoning, and addressing safety concerns like "governance decay" caused by context compaction in long-horizon agents. AI

IMPACT Advances in agent evaluation and safety mechanisms could accelerate the development and deployment of more capable and reliable AI systems.

RANK_REASON Multiple research papers introducing new benchmarks, frameworks, and analyses for LLM agents.

Read on Hugging Face Daily Papers →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 127 sources. How we write summaries →

New benchmarks and safety methods emerge for advanced LLM agents

COVERAGE [127]

  1. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Kaixuan Liu, Guojun Xiong, Weinan Zhang, Shengpu Tang ·

    Social Networks of LLM Agents

    arXiv:2607.03695v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in interacting populations, raising the question of what such populations come to believe collectively. Whether a population aggregates genuine knowledge or collapses into …

  2. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Yining She, Yiliang Liang, Eunsuk Kang ·

    Safeguarding LLM Agents from Misalignment through Provenance Analysis

    arXiv:2607.01236v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As LLM agents gain increasing access to powerful tools, ensuring that their actions are aligned with the user's intent becomes critical. When an agent's proposed tool invocation deviates from the user's intent -- a phenomenon call…

  3. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Yunhao Feng, Ruixiao Lin, Ming Wen, Qinqin He, Yanming Guo, Yifan Ding, Yutao Wu, Jialuo Chen, Yunhao Chen, Xiaohu Du, Jianan Ma, Zixing Chen, Zhuoer Xu, Xingjun Ma, Xinhao Deng ·

    Safety Testing LLM Agents at Scale: From Risk Discovery to Evidence-Grounded Verification

    arXiv:2607.01793v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents increasingly perform autonomous actions through external tools, leading to complex and evolving safety risks. However, existing safety testing targets expert-designed safety violations, and the corresponding outcomes are …

  4. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Mahyar Ghazanfari, Amin Tabrizian, Armin Mehrabian, Peng Wei ·

    EO-Agents: A Three-Agent LLM Pipeline for Earth Observation Hypothesis Generation

    arXiv:2607.01584v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models have recently been explored for scientific hypothesis generation, but most prior work relies on unstructured literature and free-form textual claims. We present a pipeline for Earth observation that grounds hyp…

  5. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Juanwu Lu, Junyu Zhu, Ziran Wang ·

    Controllable Sim Agents with Behavior Latents

    arXiv:2607.02496v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Realistic traffic simulation requires agents that imitate logged behavior and can also be steered along interpretable axes. Such controllability enables engineers to isolate variables, reproduce specific edge cases, and test auton…

  6. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Zewen Liu ·

    BOUNDARY_SYNC: Measuring Communication-Induced Representational Coupling in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

    arXiv:2607.01600v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) are deployed as communicating agents, does inter-agent communication cause outputs to converge? We introduce BOUNDARY_SYNC, a protocol measuring representational coupling via the Coupling Amplificat…

  7. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Chih-Hsuan (Bella), Yang, Tanwi Mallick, Le Chen, Krishnan Raghavan, Amal Gueroudji, Ian T. Foster, Rajeev Thakur ·

    Who Gets the Reward & Who Gets the Blame? Evaluation-Aligned Training Signals for Multi-LLM Agents

    arXiv:2511.10687v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) in multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown promise for complex tasks, yet current training methods lack principled ways to connect system-level evaluation with agent- and message-level learning. W…

  8. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Jeffrey Flynt ·

    GroundEval: A Deterministic Replacement for LLM-as-Judge in Stateful Agent Evaluation

    arXiv:2606.22737v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Before letting an agent operate over real context, can you prove it used the right evidence? GroundEval turns that question into a deterministic test of what the agent searched, fetched, cited, and was permitted to access. In on…

  9. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Trilok Padhi, Ramneet Kaur, Krishiv Agarwal, Adam D. Cobb, Daniel Elenius, Manoj Acharya, Colin Samplawski, Alexander M. Berenbeim, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Susmit Jha, Ugur Kursuncu, Anirban Roy ·

    From Actions to Understanding: Conformal Interpretability of Temporal Concepts in LLM Agents

    arXiv:2604.19775v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents capable of reasoning, planning, and acting within interactive environments. Despite their growing capability to perform multi-step reasoning and decisio…

  10. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Ziran Wang ·

    Controllable Sim Agents with Behavior Latents

    Realistic traffic simulation requires agents that imitate logged behavior and can also be steered along interpretable axes. Such controllability enables engineers to isolate variables, reproduce specific edge cases, and test autonomous systems without real-world risk. We introduc…

  11. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Jingyuan Zheng, Dongjing Wang, Xin Zhang, Butian Huang, Haiping Zhang, Dongjin Yu, Shuguang Deng ·

    SkillSelect-Serve: Budget-Controllable and QoS-Aware Skill Service Recommendation and Composition for Small LLM Agents

    arXiv:2607.00011v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reusable skill libraries are becoming important infrastructure for large language model (LLM) agents, yet existing selection methods often treat skills as retrievable documents and return fixed top-k lists. This paper presents Ski…

  12. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Xubin Hao, Hongjin Meng, Xin Yin, Jiawei Zhu, Chenpeng Cao ·

    Self-GC: Self-Governing Context for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

    arXiv:2607.00692v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon LLM agents accumulate tool results, files, plans, and user constraints that are too structured to be treated as a disposable text suffix. Current systems mostly rely on in-run heuristics such as chronological pruning an…

  13. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Yiping Li, Zhiyu An, Wan Du ·

    When Less Latent Leads to Better Relay: Information-Preserving Compression for Latent Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration

    arXiv:2604.13349v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Communication in Large Language Model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems is moving beyond discrete tokens to preserve richer context. Recent work such as LatentMAS enables agents to exchange latent messages through full key-value (…

  14. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Zewen Liu ·

    EPC: A Standardized Protocol for Measuring Evaluator Preference Dynamics in LLM Agent Systems

    arXiv:2607.00297v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When LLM agents use evaluator feedback to adapt their behavior in closed loops, evaluator biases propagate through the agent's strategy distribution -- a phenomenon known as evaluator preference coupling. Prior work has documented…

  15. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Elias Najarro, Ane Espeseth, Eleni Nisioti, Sebastian Risi, Stefano Nichele ·

    Conversable Complexity: Agentic LLM Collectives as Interpretable Substrates

    arXiv:2607.01047v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Complexity and interpretability rarely coincide: systems rich enough for complex behaviours to emerge are usually too opaque to question, while transparent ones are too simple for anything complex to emerge. A single large language …

  16. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Zewen Liu ·

    BOUNDARY_SYNC: Measuring Communication-Induced Representational Coupling in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

    As large language models (LLMs) are deployed as communicating agents, does inter-agent communication cause outputs to converge? We introduce BOUNDARY_SYNC, a protocol measuring representational coupling via the Coupling Amplification Factor (CAF = JSD_cond / JSD_baseline), where …

  17. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Stefano Nichele ·

    Conversable Complexity: Agentic LLM Collectives as Interpretable Substrates

    Complexity and interpretability rarely coincide: systems rich enough for complex behaviours to emerge are usually too opaque to question, while transparent ones are too simple for anything complex to emerge. A single large language model (LLM) is a static artefact, hardly exhibit…

  18. arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) TIER_1 English(EN) · Mirko Degli Esposti ·

    Calibrating the Instrument: Controllability of an LLM-Driven Synthetic Population

    Generative Synthetic Populations (GSP) -- the convergence of population synthesis, agent-based modelling, and LLM agents -- are attracting growing interest for urban simulation and institutional communication research. Before any GSP instrument is used on a real population, a mor…

  19. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Chenpeng Cao ·

    Self-GC: Self-Governing Context for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

    Long-horizon LLM agents accumulate tool results, files, plans, and user constraints that are too structured to be treated as a disposable text suffix. Current systems mostly rely on in-run heuristics such as chronological pruning and tool-output masking, or on final self-summary …

  20. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Javal Vyas, Milapji Singh Gill, Artan Markaj, Felix Gehlhoff, Mehmet Mercang\"oz ·

    A Tutorial on Autonomous Fault-Tolerant Control Using Knowledge-Grounded LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.31635v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fault recovery in process plants still relies heavily on plant operators, especially when faults fall outside predefined supervisory logic. Operators interpret alarms, procedures, P\&IDs, interlocks, and process trends, then d…

  21. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Idelfonso B. R. Nogueira, Sigurd Skogestad ·

    A Systematic Approach to Multi-Agent AI from Advanced Regulatory Control Theory: Safe and Auditable LLM Operator Agents for Process Control

    arXiv:2606.30877v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent literature shows that large language models (LLMs) are useful for general-purpose tasks yet perform poorly on specific domain ones. One reason is the difficulty of supplying narrow context to a general-purpose model and of …

  22. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Xinyu Zhao, Zhen Tan, Vaishnav Tadiparthi, Nakul Agarwal, Kwonjoon Lee, Ehsan Moradi Pari, Hossein Nourkhiz Mahjoub, Tianlong Chen ·

    Generative Skill Composition for LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.32025v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent LLM agents benefit from skills for solving complex tasks. Skills encapsulate modular packages of procedural knowledge and instructions for performing specialized tasks, such as setting up a sandboxed environment, running a te…

  23. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Bang Nguyen, Dominik So\'os, Qian Ma, Rochana R. Obadage, Zack Ranjan, Sai Koneru, Timothy M. Errington, Shakhlo Nematova, Sarah Rajtmajer, Jian Wu, Meng Jiang ·

    ReplicatorBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Replicability in Social and Behavioral Sciences

    arXiv:2602.11354v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The literature has witnessed an emerging interest in AI agents for automated assessment of scientific papers. Existing benchmarks focus primarily on the computational aspect of this task, testing agents' ability to reproduce or …

  24. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Renxuan Tan, Rongpeng Li, Fei Wang, Chenghui Peng, Shaoyun Wu, Zhifeng Zhao, Honggang Zhang ·

    LLM-Empowered Agentic MAC Protocols: A Dynamic Stackelberg Game Approach

    arXiv:2510.10895v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols, essential for wireless networks, are typically manually configured. While deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based protocols enhance task-specified network performance, they suffer from poor…

  25. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Sergio Hern\'andez-Guti\'errez, Matteo Merler, Ilze Amanda Auzina, Joschka Str\"uber, Ameya Prabhu, Matthias Bethge ·

    QVal: Cheaply Evaluating Dense Supervision Signals for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.32034v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM agents increasingly act over long horizons, where a single trajectory can contain hundreds or thousands of actions. In these settings, outcome-only rewards provide too sparse guidance, failing to inform the model about the goo…

  26. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Zewen Liu ·

    Calibrating the Evaluator: Does Probability Calibration Mitigate Preference Coupling in LLM Agent Feedback Loops?

    arXiv:2606.31371v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When large language model (LLM) agents adapt their behavior through evaluator feedback, systematic evaluator biases propagate into the agent's learned strategy distribution - a phenomenon termed evaluator preference coupling. Prio…

  27. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 Deutsch(DE) · Simon Jones, Sabine Hauert ·

    Emergent Culture in Minimal LLM Systems

    arXiv:2606.30668v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: What happens when LLM agents operate with no context outside a turn, minimal prompting, and simple tools? Inspired by swarm engineering, we give collectives of three agents the ability to send messages and manipulate a shared acti…

  28. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Atsushi Masumori, Itsuki Doi, Norihiro Maruyama, Ryosuke Takata, Takashi Ikegami ·

    OpenLife: Toward Open-World Artificial Life with Autonomous LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.31046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial life has explored life-like behavior on many computational substrates, but mostly in researcher-designed closed worlds. We argue that large language model (LLM) agents, with persistent memory, tool use, network access, an…

  29. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Zewen Liu ·

    EPC: A Standardized Protocol for Measuring Evaluator Preference Dynamics in LLM Agent Systems

    When LLM agents use evaluator feedback to adapt their behavior in closed loops, evaluator biases propagate through the agent's strategy distribution -- a phenomenon known as evaluator preference coupling. Prior work has documented coupling across multiple evaluator families and m…

  30. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Matthias Bethge ·

    QVal: Cheaply Evaluating Dense Supervision Signals for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

    LLM agents increasingly act over long horizons, where a single trajectory can contain hundreds or thousands of actions. In these settings, outcome-only rewards provide too sparse guidance, failing to inform the model about the goodness of intermediate actions. Dense supervision m…

  31. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Tianlong Chen ·

    Generative Skill Composition for LLM Agents

    Recent LLM agents benefit from skills for solving complex tasks. Skills encapsulate modular packages of procedural knowledge and instructions for performing specialized tasks, such as setting up a sandboxed environment, running a test suite, or refactoring a function across multi…

  32. arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) TIER_1 English(EN) · Mehmet Mercangöz ·

    A Tutorial on Autonomous Fault-Tolerant Control Using Knowledge-Grounded LLM Agents

    Fault recovery in process plants still relies heavily on plant operators, especially when faults fall outside predefined supervisory logic. Operators interpret alarms, procedures, P\&IDs, interlocks, and process trends, then decide how to move the plant to a safe operating mode w…

  33. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Zewen Liu ·

    Calibrating the Evaluator: Does Probability Calibration Mitigate Preference Coupling in LLM Agent Feedback Loops?

    When large language model (LLM) agents adapt their behavior through evaluator feedback, systematic evaluator biases propagate into the agent's learned strategy distribution - a phenomenon termed evaluator preference coupling. Prior work has documented this coupling and establishe…

  34. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Mengdie Flora Wang, Haochen Xie, Guanghui Wang, Devin Zhang, Jae Oh Woo ·

    Budgeted Act-or-Defer Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation with Local Reliability Bounds

    arXiv:2606.29654v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent deliberation among LLMs can improve reasoning, but deployment requires deciding when the current answer is reliable enough to act on and when it should be escalated to human review. We formulate this as budgeted act-or-d…

  35. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Zhengqi Pei, Qingming Huang, Shuhui Wang ·

    When LLMs Develop Languages: Symbolic Communication for Efficient Multi-Agent Reasoning

    arXiv:2606.29354v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) improves large language models (LLMs) on difficult reasoning tasks, but it often incurs long natural-language rationales that are poorly aligned with efficient machine reasoning. We propose Communicative Langu…

  36. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Huaijie Wang, Shusheng Xu, Yi Wu, Kaifeng Lyu ·

    Building Multi-Task Agentic LLMs via Two-Phase Distillation

    arXiv:2606.30044v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A key step toward artificial general intelligence is to train models that can perform multiple tasks. In this paper, we study how to build such models by first training separate RL experts for individual tasks and then consolidating…

  37. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Zewen Liu ·

    The Contagion Tensor: A Framework for Measuring Output-Distribution Coupling in Multi-Agent LLM Systems -- and Auditing the Claims It Enables

    arXiv:2606.28839v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce the Contagion Tensor, a measurement framework for quantifying how large language model (LLM) output distributions couple across modalities, agents, and time steps. From the tensor we derive the Coupling Amplification Fa…

  38. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Liu Zewen ·

    A Diagnostic Framework and Multi-Evaluator Audit of Evaluator-Driven Preference Dynamics in Self-Adapting LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.29719v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Measurements of proprietary LLM evaluators can become invalid within weeks -- we document one case and provide the diagnostic framework to detect it. We introduce EPC -- comprising the Multimodal Preference Collapse Index (MPCI), …

  39. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Sebastian Kula, Martin Tamajka ·

    Multi-Agentic System Leveraging Open-Source LLMs to Mitigate Disinformation Threats

    arXiv:2606.30259v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In contemporary societies, the threat of disinformation has reached alarming levels, exacerbated by the proliferation of electronic communication, social media, and advancements in artificial intelligence. As a result, there is an u…

  40. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 Deutsch(DE) · Haejoon Lee, Vincent-Daniel Yun, Dimitra Panagou, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy ·

    Robust Multi-Agent LLMs under Byzantine Faults

    arXiv:2605.09076v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly collaborate over peer-to-peer networks to improve their reliability. However, these same interactions can also become a source of vulnerability, as unreliable or Byzantine age…

  41. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Brian Y. Tsui, Alan Y. Fang, Tiffany J. Hwu ·

    Demonstration-Free Robotic Control via LLM Agents

    arXiv:2601.20334v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Robotic manipulation has increasingly adopted vision-language-action (VLA) models, which achieve strong performance but typically require task-specific demonstrations and fine-tuning, and often generalize poorly under doma…

  42. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Shiyang Chen ·

    Governance Decay: How Context Compaction Silently Erases Safety Constraints in Long-Horizon LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.22528v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modern LLM agents increasingly rely on context compaction, summarization, or eviction to keep long-running sessions within a token budget. We show that this context-management layer is a safety-critical failure surface: in-conte…

  43. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Weihao Tan, Changjiu Jiang, Yu Duan, Mingcong Lei, Jiageng Li, Yitian Hong, Xinrun Wang, Bo An ·

    StarDojo: Benchmarking Open-Ended Behaviors of Agentic Multimodal LLMs in Production-Living Simulations with Stardew Valley

    arXiv:2507.07445v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autonomous agents navigating human society must master both production activities and social interactions, yet existing benchmarks rarely evaluate these skills simultaneously. To bridge this gap, we introduce StarDojo, a novel b…

  44. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Henrique Ferraz de Arruda, Carlos Gracia L\'azaro, Alberto Aleta, Yamir Moreno ·

    Collective cooperation without individual fidelity in LLM agents

    arXiv:2606.30454v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as agents in simulations of social systems, yet it remains unclear when their behavior can be interpreted as a faithful proxy for human decision-making. Here we test LLM agents ag…

  45. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · David Mellafe Zuvic ·

    Capability Gates Are Not Authorization: Confused-Deputy Failures in LLM Agent Frameworks

    arXiv:2606.28679v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-using LLM agents increasingly read untrusted content while holding side-effecting tools such as payments, email, CRM, and infrastructure APIs, yet common framework defaults still conflate tool exposure with authorization. We …

  46. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Seongjae Kang, Taehyung Yu, Sung Ju Hwang ·

    PolicyGuard: A Dialogue-Grounded Sub-Agent Verifier for Policy Adherence in LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.29225v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents handle user requests on behalf of organizations through tool calls and must follow the company policies stated in their system prompts. Prior work approaches this as a safeguarding problem -- external checks that block no…

  47. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Xuan Zhang, Wenxuan Zhang, See-Kiong Ng, Yang Deng ·

    Self-Evolving World Models for LLM Agent Planning

    arXiv:2606.30639v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: World models offer a principled way to equip long-horizon LLM agents with foresight: predictions of action consequences before execution. However, unreliable foresight can be ignored, misused, or even degrade downstream decision-mak…

  48. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Joon Sung Park, Carolyn Q. Zou, Jonne Kamphorst, Niles Egan, Aaron Shaw, Benjamin Mako Hill, Carrie Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, Robb Willer, Michael S. Bernstein ·

    LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals

    arXiv:2411.10109v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine learning can predict human behavior well when substantial structured data are available for well-defined outcomes. Such models are typically outcome-specific, however, requiring training data for each target outcome, lim…

  49. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Jiayu Liu, Cheng Qian, Zhaochen Su, Qing Zong, Shijue Huang, Bingxiang He, Yi R. Fung ·

    CostBench: Evaluating Multi-Turn Cost-Optimal Planning and Adaptation in Dynamic Environments for LLM Tool-Use Agents

    arXiv:2511.02734v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current evaluations of Large Language Model (LLM) agents primarily emphasize task completion, often overlooking resource efficiency and adaptability. This neglects a crucial capability: agents' ability to devise and adjust cost-…

  50. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    QVal: Cheaply Evaluating Dense Supervision Signals for Long-Horizon LLM Agents

    A testbed called QVal is introduced for evaluating dense supervision signals in long-horizon LLM agent tasks by measuring how well method scores align with Q-values, enabling fair comparison of different supervision approaches without training.

  51. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Yang Deng ·

    Self-Evolving World Models for LLM Agent Planning

    World models offer a principled way to equip long-horizon LLM agents with foresight: predictions of action consequences before execution. However, unreliable foresight can be ignored, misused, or even degrade downstream decision-making. In this paper, we introduce WorldEvolver, a…

  52. arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) TIER_1 English(EN) · Jacques Samain ·

    MAS-Lab: A Specification-Driven Validation Framework for Reliable Multi-Agent Systems

    The rapid emergence of LLM-based agentic frameworks has significantly reduced the cost of assembling multi-agent systems (MAS), enabling fast prototyping and exploration of agentic behaviors. However, systems built with current tooling remain ill-suited for reliable, evolvable, a…

  53. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Yamir Moreno ·

    Collective cooperation without individual fidelity in LLM agents

    Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as agents in simulations of social systems, yet it remains unclear when their behavior can be interpreted as a faithful proxy for human decision-making. Here we test LLM agents against a direct empirical benchmark: a large-scale …

  54. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Martin Tamajka ·

    Multi-Agentic System Leveraging Open-Source LLMs to Mitigate Disinformation Threats

    In contemporary societies, the threat of disinformation has reached alarming levels, exacerbated by the proliferation of electronic communication, social media, and advancements in artificial intelligence. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop effective countermeasures …

  55. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    LLM Agents Are Latent Context Managers: Eliciting Self-Managed Context via a Proprioceptive Dashboard

    Long-horizon tool agents are bottlenecked by how their context grows toward the limits of the context window. Recent systems make context management agent- or system-controlled, but they either learn a compression policy that discards evidence or manage context in a layer the age…

  56. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Javal Vyas, Milapji Singh Gill, Artan Markaj, Felix Gehlhoff, Mehmet Mercang\"oz ·

    From Detection to Action: Using LLM Agents for Fault-Tolerant Control

    arXiv:2606.28011v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose an agentic Large Language Model (LLM) framework for active Fault-Tolerant Control (FTC) that transforms fault detection outputs into constraint-aware recovery actions grounded in plant-specific knowledge. The approach c…

  57. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Xiang Long, Li Du, Yilong Xu, RongJian Xu, Qiyanhui Lu, Ying Gao, Qinhua Xie, Fangcheng Liu, Ning Ding, Haoqing Wang, Ziheng Li, Changjiang Zhou, Jianyuan Guo, Yehui Tang ·

    LiveClawBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Complex, Real-World Assistant Tasks

    arXiv:2604.13072v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: OpenClaw-style personal assistants extend LLM agents from isolated tool use to open-ended, stateful, and personalized software environments. Evaluating these assistants is fundamentally a fidelity problem: benchmarks must …

  58. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Xinyuan Song, Zekun Cai ·

    Grounded Iterative Language Planning: How Parameterized World Models Reduce Hallucination Propagation in LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.27806v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: World models for language agents come in two useful forms. An agent-based world model calls an LLM API and reasons flexibly in language, but its errors appear as hallucinated state changes that are hard to score with ordinary regres…

  59. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Ronny Ko, Jiseong Jeong, Shuyuan Zheng, Chuan Xiao, Tae-Wan Kim, Makoto Onizuka, Won-Yong Shin ·

    Seven Security Challenges That Must be Solved in Cross-domain Multi-agent LLM Systems

    arXiv:2505.23847v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly evolving into autonomous agents that cooperate across organizational boundaries, enabling joint disaster response, supply-chain optimization, and other tasks that demand decentraliz…

  60. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Xuan Zhang, Zhijian Zhou, Lingfeng Qiao, Yulei Qin, Ke Li, Xing Sun, Xiaoyu Tan, Chao Qu, Yuan Qi ·

    Internalizing the Future: A Unified Agentic Training Paradigm for World Model Planning

    arXiv:2606.27483v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capability in sequential decision-making, yet they remains fundamentally reactive in long-horizon tasks. Unlike humans who employ "what-if" reasoning to evaluate potential p…

  61. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Igor Itkin ·

    Delayed Verification Destabilizes Multi-Agent LLM Belief: Instability Thresholds and Optimal Corrector Placement

    arXiv:2606.27409v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems often rely on verifier and critic agents to suppress hallucinations, but verification is delayed. During this delay, false claims can propagate through the agent network. We model thi…

  62. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Chuanhao Li, Xiaoan Xu, Dirk Bergemann, Ethan X. Fang, Yehua Wei, Zhuoran Yang ·

    COOPA: A Modular LLM Agent Architecture for Operations Research Problems

    arXiv:2606.27611v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Operations Research (OR) provides a rigorous framework for high-stakes decision-making, but effective OR modeling requires substantial domain knowledge, mathematical abstraction, and solver expertise. Recent LLM-based systems automa…

  63. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Liu Zewen ·

    A Diagnostic Framework and Multi-Evaluator Audit of Evaluator-Driven Preference Dynamics in Self-Adapting LLM Agents

    Measurements of proprietary LLM evaluators can become invalid within weeks -- we document one case and provide the diagnostic framework to detect it. We introduce EPC -- comprising the Multimodal Preference Collapse Index (MPCI), evaluator-indexed coupling matrix, and Jensen-Shan…

  64. arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) TIER_1 English(EN) · Jae Oh Woo ·

    Budgeted Act-or-Defer Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation with Local Reliability Bounds

    Multi-agent deliberation among LLMs can improve reasoning, but deployment requires deciding when the current answer is reliable enough to act on and when it should be escalated to human review. We formulate this as budgeted act-or-defer decision making. At each round, the system …

  65. arXiv cs.NE (Neural & Evolutionary) TIER_1 English(EN) · Shuhui Wang ·

    When LLMs Develop Languages: Symbolic Communication for Efficient Multi-Agent Reasoning

    Chain-of-Thought (CoT) improves large language models (LLMs) on difficult reasoning tasks, but it often incurs long natural-language rationales that are poorly aligned with efficient machine reasoning. We propose Communicative Language Symbolism Routing (CLSR), a test-time framew…

  66. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    PolicyGuard: A Dialogue-Grounded Sub-Agent Verifier for Policy Adherence in LLM Agents

    POLICYGUARD is a sub-agent verifier that enhances LLM agent policy adherence by providing contextual reasoning and conversation-specific feedback across multi-turn interactions.

  67. arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) TIER_1 English(EN) · Carlos Baquero ·

    When Latent Agents Lie: KV-Cache Integrity in Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration

    LLM agents can share more than text. In some systems, an agent can send a short visible message while also passing its full KV-cache state to another model. This hidden state can help the final model combine evidence from several agents, but it is also hard to inspect. A visible …

  68. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Mehmet Mercangöz ·

    From Detection to Action: Using LLM Agents for Fault-Tolerant Control

    We propose an agentic Large Language Model (LLM) framework for active Fault-Tolerant Control (FTC) that transforms fault detection outputs into constraint-aware recovery actions grounded in plant-specific knowledge. The approach couples (i) a multi-agent workflow that decomposes …

  69. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Zekun Cai ·

    Grounded Iterative Language Planning: How Parameterized World Models Reduce Hallucination Propagation in LLM Agents

    World models for language agents come in two useful forms. An agent-based world model calls an LLM API and reasons flexibly in language, but its errors appear as hallucinated state changes that are hard to score with ordinary regression losses. A parameterized world model is a tr…

  70. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Luyang Zhang, Jialu Wang, Fei Xue, Yi-Yun Chu ·

    Post-Training Recipe, More Than Model Family, Shapes Multi-Agent LLM Conversational Behavior

    arXiv:2606.20632v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-LLM systems use multiple language models to deliberate, judge each other's outputs, or coordinate as agents. Their value depends on the models producing measurably different conversational behaviors when given the sa…

  71. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · David Akinpelu, Akintonde Abbas, Rereloluwa Alimi, Ayodeji Lana ·

    How Do Tool-Augmented LLM Agents Perform on Real-World Energy Analytics Tasks?

    arXiv:2606.26346v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic benchmarks have emerged across general-purpose and domain-specific settings, including finance, coding, law, and drug discovery, yet energy-domain evaluations remain largely limited to static knowledge recall. This is a crit…

  72. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Sahil Shrivastava ·

    Semantic Early-Stopping for Iterative LLM Agent Loops

    arXiv:2606.27009v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent large language model (LLM) loops, for example a Writer that drafts and a Critic that revises, are almost always terminated by a fixed iteration cap (max_iterations). This is a syntactic kill-switch: it is blind to whethe…

  73. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Praneeth Narisetty, Shiva Nagendra Babu Kore, Uday Kumar Reddy Kattamanchi, Jayaram Kumarapu ·

    Adaptive Evaluation of Out-of-Band Defenses Against Prompt Injection in LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.26479v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent work (2024 to 2026) has converged on a strategy for defending tool-using LLM agents against indirect prompt injection: rather than training the model to refuse malicious instructions, enforce security outside the model with…

  74. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Sriram Selvam, Anneswa Ghosh ·

    ProfileFoundry: A Synthetic Person-Object Substrate for Privacy, Memory, and Tool-Use Evaluation in LLM Agent

    arXiv:2606.26403v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation-model research increasingly needs data about people: user state, personal histories, relationships, contact-like fields, documents, and longitudinal updates. Real user data is difficult to share, perturb, audit, or redist…

  75. arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) TIER_1 English(EN) · Tao Feng ·

    GenWorld: Empirically Grounded Urban Simulation Infrastructure for Scalable LLM-Agent Studies

    LLM-agent simulation faces a joint grounding and scaling problem: agents should act in environments that reflect real urban constraints, yet direct online LLM calls for city-scale populations are computationally prohibitive. We present GenWorld, an empirically grounded urban simu…

  76. arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) TIER_1 English(EN) · Jiaming Cui ·

    QueenBee Planner: Skill-Evolving Communication Topologies for Token-Efficient LLM Multi-Agent Systems

    Large language model (LLM) multi-agent systems increasingly depend not only on how individual agents reason, but also on how agents are connected. This paper introduces QueenBee Planner, a framework that treats inter-agent communication topology as a retrievable and self-improvin…

  77. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Sahil Shrivastava ·

    Semantic Early-Stopping for Iterative LLM Agent Loops

    Multi-agent large language model (LLM) loops, for example a Writer that drafts and a Critic that revises, are almost always terminated by a fixed iteration cap (max_iterations). This is a syntactic kill-switch: it is blind to whether the answer is still improving, so it over-spen…

  78. arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) TIER_1 English(EN) · Igor Itkin ·

    Delayed Verification Destabilizes Multi-Agent LLM Belief: Instability Thresholds and Optimal Corrector Placement

    Multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems often rely on verifier and critic agents to suppress hallucinations, but verification is delayed. During this delay, false claims can propagate through the agent network. We model this process as delayed consensus on a graph with gro…

  79. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Kyungmin Kim, Youngbin Choi, Seoyeon Lee, Suhyeon Jun, Dongwoo Kim, Sangdon Park ·

    The Interplay of Harness Design and Post-Training in LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.25447v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-integrated LLM agents are often wrapped within a harness: the scaffolding that determines which tools are exposed, how they are described, and what auxiliary information accompanies each per-step observation. While agents are…

  80. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 English(EN) · Changdae Oh, Wendi Li, Seongheon Park, Samuel Yeh, Tanwi Mallick, Sharon Li ·

    Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents

    arXiv:2606.26080v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Process reward models enable fine-grained, step-level evaluation of LLMs, yet building them for agentic settings remains prohibitively difficult: long-horizon interactions, irreversible actions, and stochastic environment feedback m…

  81. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Jayaram Kumarapu ·

    Adaptive Evaluation of Out-of-Band Defenses Against Prompt Injection in LLM Agents

    Recent work (2024 to 2026) has converged on a strategy for defending tool-using LLM agents against indirect prompt injection: rather than training the model to refuse malicious instructions, enforce security outside the model with a deterministic policy that mediates the agent's …

  82. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    Delayed Verification Destabilizes Multi-Agent LLM Belief: Instability Thresholds and Optimal Corrector Placement

    Delayed verification in multi-agent LLM systems can cause instability leading to oscillations, but grounded factual answering stabilizes the system by making truth an absorbing boundary.

  83. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Anneswa Ghosh ·

    ProfileFoundry: A Synthetic Person-Object Substrate for Privacy, Memory, and Tool-Use Evaluation in LLM Agent

    Foundation-model research increasingly needs data about people: user state, personal histories, relationships, contact-like fields, documents, and longitudinal updates. Real user data is difficult to share, perturb, audit, or redistribute responsibly, while independently generate…

  84. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Sharon Li ·

    Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents

    Process reward models enable fine-grained, step-level evaluation of LLMs, yet building them for agentic settings remains prohibitively difficult: long-horizon interactions, irreversible actions, and stochastic environment feedback make both human annotation and Monte Carlo estima…

  85. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Sangdon Park ·

    The Interplay of Harness Design and Post-Training in LLM Agents

    Tool-integrated LLM agents are often wrapped within a harness: the scaffolding that determines which tools are exposed, how they are described, and what auxiliary information accompanies each per-step observation. While agents are routinely post-trained, this scaffolding is typic…

  86. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Khanak Khandelwal (Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur) ·

    AdversaBench: Automated LLM Red-Teaming with Multi-Judge Confirmation and Cross-Model Transferability

    arXiv:2606.24589v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scaling adversarial evaluation of large language models requires both a method for generating hard inputs and a reliable way to confirm that resulting failures are real. We present AdversaBench, an end-to-end red-teaming pipeline th…

  87. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Pingchuan Ma, Zhaoyu Wang, Zimo Ji, Yuguang Zhou, Zhantong Xue, Zongjie Li, Shuai Wang, Xiaoqin Zhang ·

    AutoSpec: Safety Rule Evolution for LLM Agents via Inductive Logic Programming

    arXiv:2606.24245v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly automate complex tasks by integrating language models with external tools and environments. However, their autonomy poses significant safety risks: agents may execute destructive comm…

  88. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 Română(RO) · Kevin Qiu, Marek Cygan ·

    Debate2Create: Robot Co-design via Multi-Agent LLM Debate

    arXiv:2510.25850v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce Debate2Create (D2C), a multi-agent LLM framework that formulates robot co-design as structured, iterative debate grounded in physics-based evaluation. A design agent and control agent engage in a thesis-antith…

  89. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents

    Reinforcement learning post-training enables effective step-level scoring for language models without requiring dedicated reward model training by deriving an implicit advantage function called progress advantage.

  90. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Khanak Khandelwal ·

    AdversaBench: Automated LLM Red-Teaming with Multi-Judge Confirmation and Cross-Model Transferability

    Scaling adversarial evaluation of large language models requires both a method for generating hard inputs and a reliable way to confirm that resulting failures are real. We present AdversaBench, an end-to-end red-teaming pipeline that mutates seed prompts with five structured ope…

  91. arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) TIER_1 English(EN) · Laixi Shi ·

    MAS-PromptBench: When Does Prompt Optimization Improve Multi-Agent LLM Systems?

    Multi-agent systems (MAS) offer a scalable path forward for agentic AI, comprising multiple LLM-based agents, each assigned a system prompt and a position within a workflow that governs inter-agent coordination and output aggregation. System prompts thus form a critical and acces…

  92. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Hannaneh Hajishirzi ·

    Tmax: A simple recipe for terminal agents

    Terminal-using agents have quickly become the most popular downstream application of language models (LMs). Despite their prevalence, relatively little academic work has examined RL-based training of these models, likely due to difficult benchmarks, a lack of data, and a lack of …

  93. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Anupam Datta ·

    Plans Don't Persist: Why Context Management Is Load Bearing for LLM Agents

    Long-horizon agents depend on context management: systems compress, summarize, and evict old tokens so tasks can continue beyond finite windows. That is safe only when dropped information is no longer needed or has been internalized. Plans are the stress case: they are written ea…

  94. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    GroundEval: A Deterministic Replacement for LLM-as-Judge in Stateful Agent Evaluation

    Before letting an agent operate over real context, can you prove it used the right evidence? GroundEval turns that question into a deterministic test of what the agent searched, fetched, cited, and was permitted to access. In one case study, two frontier LLM judges scored a plaus…

  95. arXiv cs.CL TIER_1 English(EN) · Jeffrey Flynt ·

    GroundEval: A Deterministic Replacement for LLM-as-Judge in Stateful Agent Evaluation

    Before letting an agent operate over real context, can you prove it used the right evidence? GroundEval turns that question into a deterministic test of what the agent searched, fetched, cited, and was permitted to access. In one case study, two frontier LLM judges scored a plaus…

  96. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    When Agents Commit Too Soon: Diagnosing Premature Commitment in LLM Agents

    Pre premature commitment in long-horizon LLM agents leads to silent failures where agents defend early interpretations without considering alternatives, and hidden-state convergence serves as an early diagnostic for trajectory consistency.

  97. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    Plans Don't Persist: Why Context Management Is Load Bearing for LLM Agents

    Standard LLM agents rely on plan content remaining in context rather than maintaining it as persistent state, with evidence shown through replay pairing diagnostics and compression stress tests.

  98. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    Tmax: A simple recipe for terminal agents

    A novel RL training approach for terminal agents achieves superior performance using a simplified recipe and expanded dataset, enabling effective training with fewer parameters than previous methods.

  99. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    CLI-Universe: Towards Verifiable Task Synthesis Engine for Terminal Agents

    A principled synthesis engine generates high-quality terminal-agent tasks through multi-dimensional capability taxonomy and evidence-guided research, creating a distilled dataset that enables significant performance gains in LLM training.

  100. arXiv cs.NE (Neural & Evolutionary) TIER_1 Deutsch(DE) · Sabine Hauert ·

    Emergent Culture in Minimal LLM Systems

    What happens when LLM agents operate with no context outside a turn, minimal prompting, and simple tools? Inspired by swarm engineering, we give collectives of three agents the ability to send messages and manipulate a shared actively decaying text store, introducing evolutionary…

  101. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Shiyang Chen ·

    Governance Decay: How Context Compaction Silently Erases Safety Constraints in Long-Horizon LLM Agents

    Modern LLM agents increasingly rely on context compaction, summarization, or eviction to keep long-running sessions within a token budget. We show that this context-management layer is a safety-critical failure surface: in-context governance constraints that agents reliably obey …

  102. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Yehui Yang ·

    Hypothesis-Driven Skill Optimization for LLM Agents

    External skills can improve action-oriented LLM agents without changing model weights, but persistent skill updates are risky when they are distilled from sparse or noisy trajectories. A plausible reflection may encode a useful procedure, a spurious shortcut, or a rule that the t…

  103. arXiv cs.AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Shreyas KC ·

    BabelJudge: Measuring LLM-as-a-Judge Reliability Across Languages and Agent Trajectories

    LLM-as-a-judge has become the dominant approach to scalable evaluation in NLP pipelines, yet judges themselves carry systematic biases that raw accuracy hides: they favor responses placed in slot A (position bias), they prefer longer responses regardless of quality (verbosity bia…

  104. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    Training the Orchestrator: A Supervised Approach to End-to-End PDDL Planning with LLM Agents

    Translating natural-language planning intent into verified plans is a longstanding challenge: people communicate goals in language, while classical planners require formal PDDL specifications. Recent agentic frameworks bridge this gap by orchestrating a pool of specialized repair…

  105. arXiv cs.MA (Multiagent) TIER_1 English(EN) · Zewen Liu ·

    Contagion Networks: Evaluator Preference Propagation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems

    When large language models serve as evaluators in multi-agent systems, their strategy preferences -- whether induced by explicit prompts or by shared architectural priors -- propagate through the agent network. We introduce Contagion Networks, a formal framework for measuring how…

  106. arXiv cs.IR (Information Retrieval) TIER_1 English(EN) · Suranjan Goswami ·

    PACMS: Submodular Context Selection as a Pluggable Engine for LLM Agents

    Conversational and tool-using LLM agents operate over a context window that fills from several directions simultaneously. As a session proceeds, the agent accumulates user and assistant turns, entries drawn from a persistent memory store, and often largest of all, the verbatim ou…

  107. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    When Lower Privileges Suffice: Investigating Over-Privileged Tool Selection in LLM Agents

    LLM agents frequently select higher-privilege tools unnecessarily, and while safety alignment doesn't ensure least-privilege choices, a post-training defense can reduce excessive privilege use without sacrificing performance.

  108. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    Context-Aware RL for Agentic and Multimodal LLMs

    ContextRL enhances long-horizon reasoning and multimodal performance through reinforcement learning that rewards context selection for supporting query-answer pairs, achieving improvements over standard methods on diverse benchmarks.

  109. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    CoffeeBench: Benchmarking Long-Horizon LLM Agents in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Economies

    CoffeeBench evaluates LLM agents in a multi-agent economic simulation where firms interact over 90 days to maximize profits, revealing differences in communication patterns and performance among various models.

  110. arXiv cs.CV TIER_1 English(EN) · Nuo Chen, Lulin Liu, Zihao Li, Ziyao Zeng, Zihao Zhu, Wenyan Cong, Junyuan Hong, Yunhao Yang, Zhengzhong Tu, Yan Wang, Boris Ivanovic, Marco Pavone, Zhangyang Wang, Yang Zhou, Zhiwen Fan ·

    A Physics-Grounded Benchmark for Multi-Agent Dynamics in World Models

    arXiv:2606.28757v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative world models hold immense promise as scalable simulators for autonomous systems, particularly for synthesizing rare but safety-critical multi-agent interactions, such as vehicle collisions. However, current evaluation par…

  111. Replit blog TIER_1 English(EN) ·

    Closing the loop: Evaluating and improving Replit Agent at scale

    Most Replit Agent users start with nothing more than an idea. They describe the goal in natural language — without a repo, test suite, or chosen framework — and expect the agent to turn it into a functioning app. The result might be a website, slide deck, mobile app, several conn…

  112. X — Nathan Lambert (Interconnects) TIER_1 English(EN) · natolambert ·

    TMax: An open RL recipe for terminal agents

    TMax: An open RL recipe for terminal agents I’m very excited to get to share a new RL paper today that I got to have a small part in – a type of paper I suspect we’ll see much more of in the future. The key is that RL research is very different today, in mid-2026, than what most

  113. Towards AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Sachinbenchihalli ·

    Reflection Agent Architecture: Eliminating LLM Hallucinations via Tool-Grounded Iterative…

    <h3>Reflection Agent Architecture: Eliminating LLM Hallucinations via Tool-Grounded Iterative Self-Verification</h3><p>A Technical Design Paper Covering Prompt Architecture, Multi-Agent Design, and LangGraph Integration</p><blockquote><em>Large language models (LLMs) are increasi…

  114. dev.to — MCP tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Ruben ·

    How I built a free event-sourced world model to stop multiple LLM agents from corrupting shared state

    <h2> The problem </h2> <p>I kept hitting the same wall building multi-agent systems: LLMs that write directly to shared state corrupt it. They hallucinate field values, conflict with each other, produce structurally invalid data. The more agents you add, the worse it gets — corru…

  115. dev.to — MCP tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Diogo Santos ·

    The Weaver Stack: One Contract Layer for Safe LLM Agents

    <div class="crayons-card c-embed text-styles text-styles--secondary"> <div class="c-embed__content"> <div class="c-embed__body flex items-center justify-between"> <a class="c-link fw-bold flex items-center" href="https://pub.towardsai.net/the-weaver-stack-one-contract-layer-for-s…

  116. Mastodon — sigmoid.social TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    "More Skills, Worse Agents? Skill Shadowing Degrades Performance When Expanding Skill Libraries" Skill libraries allow LLM agents to load task-specific instruct

    "More Skills, Worse Agents? Skill Shadowing Degrades Performance When Expanding Skill Libraries" Skill libraries allow LLM agents to load task-specific instructions on demand, letting non-expert users solve domain-specific tasks through natural language without knowing which skil…

  117. Towards AI TIER_1 English(EN) · Divy Yadav ·

    Building Long-Running Claude Managed Agents: Why State Matters More Than Compute

    <figure><img alt="" src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1024/1*dFGAIvcuYh47KDmw_2WpQQ.png" /><figcaption>Photo from AI</figcaption></figure><h4>A build story with real code, real failures, and the specific reasons one sandbox provider fixed problems I didn’t know I had.</h4>…

  118. Medium — MCP tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Diogo Santos ·

    The Weaver Stack: One Contract Layer for Safe LLM Agents

    <div class="medium-feed-item"><p class="medium-feed-image"><a href="https://pub.towardsai.net/the-weaver-stack-one-contract-layer-for-safe-llm-agents-7f733cad5eac?source=rss------mcp-5"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1500/0*OZushp79ixGE9vEL.png" width="1500" /></a>…

  119. HN — AI startup stories TIER_1 English(EN) · dhorthy ·

    12-factor Agents: Patterns of reliable LLM applications

  120. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Gabriel Anhaia ·

    Multi-Agent Coordination: Message-Bus Patterns That Keep Agents Sane

    <ul> <li> <strong>Book:</strong> <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GX35XTG6" rel="noopener noreferrer">Agents in Production — Building, Tracing, and Shipping Multi-Step AI You Can Trust</a> </li> <li> <strong>Also by me:</strong> <a href="https://www.amazon.de/-/en/dp/B0GXNNMK…

  121. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Guillermo Fernandez ·

    Beyond Prompted Caution and Guardrails: Runtime-Enforced Pre-Action Cognition for Trustworthy LLM Agents

    <p><a class="article-body-image-wrapper" href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Faoxty8tgp9e88wzuoozc.png"><img alt=" " height="1000"…

  122. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Sébastien Conejo ·

    The reliability stack for LLM agents: tools and methods

    <p>A request can fail at three moments: before you send it, while it runs, or after it returns. Different tools and habits cover different moments. This is a directory grouped by what each one does.</p> <h1> Methods you apply yourself </h1> <p>You apply these for free, and they r…

  123. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/vagobond45 ·

    A system-level approach to prompt injection: separating instruction and data channels in LLM agents [P]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Prompt injection has emerged as one of the most persistent failure modes in tool-using LLM systems, particularly in agentic workflows where models interact with external data sources.</p> <p>Most mitigation strategies focus on input filtering or …

  124. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Jonah T ·

    Context Warp Drive: deterministic folding for long-running LLM agents

    <p>Context Warp Drive is an open-source TypeScript library for keeping long-running LLM agents under the context ceiling without asking another model to summarize their state.</p> <p>The core trick is deterministic folding. Instead of summarization calls, it compacts old transcri…

  125. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · 최해일 ·

    The Loadout Pattern: Handing the Wheel to an Autonomous LLM

    <h1> The Loadout Pattern: Handing the Wheel to an Autonomous LLM </h1> <h2> The core idea </h2> <p>Conventional automation <strong>executes</strong> a procedure — code runs a fixed sequence of steps and decides<br /> nothing; same input, same path, every time. The loadout pattern…

  126. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/ThirdWaveCat ·

    [R] Compiling Agentic Workflows into LLM Weights: Near-Frontier Quality at Two Orders of Magnitude Less Cost

    <table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/1ufgpnh/r_compiling_agentic_workflows_into_llm_weights/"> <img alt="[R] Compiling Agentic Workflows into LLM Weights: Near-Frontier Quality at Two Orders of Magnitude Less Cost" src="https://external-prev…

  127. r/LocalLLaMA TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/pmttyji ·

    TMax: A Simple Recipe for Terminal Agents

    <table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1uco0aa/tmax_a_simple_recipe_for_terminal_agents/"> <img alt="TMax: A Simple Recipe for Terminal Agents" src="https://preview.redd.it/u8v8ya27su8h1.png?width=140&amp;height=68&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=f2295f1d2a376…