PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 15:00:54

New research redefines epistemic uncertainty in machine learning

A new paper challenges the standard definitions of epistemic uncertainty in machine learning, arguing that the common measure is inconsistent with the definition of uncertainty reducible by more data. The research proposes a revised taxonomy that distinguishes between sample-reducible and mechanism-reducible epistemic uncertainty. It also demonstrates that in-distribution data may not reduce, and can even increase, mechanism-irreducible uncertainty, suggesting that ensemble disagreement is a poor proxy for epistemic uncertainty. AI

IMPACT Challenges existing frameworks for understanding model uncertainty, potentially impacting how AI systems are evaluated and deployed.

RANK_REASON The cluster contains an academic paper discussing theoretical aspects of machine learning uncertainty.

Read on arXiv stat.ML →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 2 sources. How we write summaries →

COVERAGE [2]

  1. arXiv stat.ML TIER_1 English(EN) · Robin Young ·

    Epistemic Uncertainty Is Not the Reducible Kind

    arXiv:2606.12646v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The standard taxonomy of predictive uncertainty defines epistemic uncertainty as the part removable by collecting more data, while the standard measure identifies it with a mutual-information term. We prove the definition and the me…

  2. arXiv stat.ML TIER_1 English(EN) · Robin Young ·

    Epistemic Uncertainty Is Not the Reducible Kind

    The standard taxonomy of predictive uncertainty defines epistemic uncertainty as the part removable by collecting more data, while the standard measure identifies it with a mutual-information term. We prove the definition and the measure are extensionally inconsistent. On an expl…