PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 00:56:07

TMLR desk rejections prompt researcher questions on venue suitability

A researcher on Reddit's r/MachineLearning subreddit is seeking to understand the commonality and reasons behind desk rejections from the Transactions on Machine Learning and Systems (TMLR) journal. The user received a rejection citing "not a suitable venue" and "does not meet our editorial standards," and is looking for insights into what typically triggers such decisions, such as scope mismatch or insufficient evidence, to better target future submissions. AI

IMPACT Researchers seeking publication venues should be aware of journal submission standards and common rejection reasons.

RANK_REASON User is asking about the commonality and reasons for desk rejections from a specific academic journal. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/observer678 ·

    How common are TMLR desk rejections with "not a suitable venue"? [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Submitted a short theoretical paper to TMLR and got desk-rejected with &quot;does not meet our editorial standards or allow us to assess claims and evidence&quot; and &quot;not a suitable venue for this work.&quot;</p> <p>Is this a common outcome…