PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 21:05:00

Privacy advocates push for offline, personal device computing over AI

The user argues that true privacy in computing can only be achieved through fully offline, personal device-based systems, contrasting this with AI technologies that often externalize costs. They suggest that air-gapped self-hosting, exemplified by Mistral's approach, has attracted profitable industrial clients for tasks like quality control, which they categorize as machine learning and machine vision rather than true AI. AI

IMPACT Advocates for strict privacy measures suggest that AI's computational demands and potential for externalized costs necessitate a return to offline, personal device-centric computing models.

RANK_REASON The cluster contains a user's opinion and argument about privacy and AI, not a factual event.

Read on Mastodon — mastodon.social →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — mastodon.social TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    @ alcatholic @ Linux @ nileane @ EUCommission the only ones that can provide any resemblance of privacy are those that run 100% on ine's personal device & offli

    @ alcatholic @ Linux @ nileane @ EUCommission the only ones that can provide any resemblance of privacy are those that run 100% on ine's personal device & offline! Not that it makes them any less Wasteful Computing , but at least it forces those fanboying AI slop to actually pay …