PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 07:18:25

ICML rejected paper review visibility sparks confusion

The International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) has a policy regarding the visibility of rejected papers and their reviews. Initially, reviews were only to be visible if authors opted-in and no one opted-out. However, a user reported that reviews for their rejected paper are visible to everyone, despite no authors making an explicit selection. This has led to confusion about the actual visibility settings and how they are applied. AI

IMPACT Clarifies academic publishing norms for AI research, impacting author decisions on review visibility.

RANK_REASON The cluster discusses a specific policy and its application regarding academic paper reviews, which falls under research-related discussions. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Curious-Monitor497 ·

    ICML rejected paper visibility [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>If ICML conference paper is rejected and no one opts-in or opts-out to keep the reviews visible, will the reviews be visible to everyone? There was clear instruction that only papers with at-least 1 opt-in AND zero opt-out options will be visible…