PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 09:39:52

Cursor code review process frustrates user

A user expressed frustration with Cursor's code review process, noting that generated code received numerous critical comments. Despite addressing the initial feedback, the code still required significant revisions. The user also found that manually written code had more issues than the AI-generated version, leading to a frustrating development loop. AI

IMPACT Highlights potential friction points in AI-assisted coding workflows.

RANK_REASON User-generated content discussing a specific product's functionality and user experience.

Read on r/cursor →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/cursor TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/batman-iphone ·

    Cursor code review frustration! Need suggestions here

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>&#x200b;</p> <p>I used Vibe to generate code with Cursor based on a person’s requirements. Cursor’s code review returned 75 comments, 23 of them critical. I addressed those issues and Cursor re-reviewed the code, leaving 50 comments.</p> <p>Curso…