A plaintiff in a Michigan federal court case is facing scrutiny for allegedly using ChatGPT as legal counsel during a deposition. Opposing counsel observed the pro se litigant reading responses from ChatGPT and invoking attorney-client privilege when questioned about her use of the AI tool. An emergency hearing was convened to address the matter, with the judge expected to rule on the permissibility of using AI in this capacity. AI
Summary written by gemini-2.5-flash-lite from 1 source. How we write summaries →
IMPACT Explores the boundaries of AI use in legal proceedings and potential implications for attorney-client privilege.
RANK_REASON A pro se litigant's use of ChatGPT during a deposition raises questions about AI's role in legal proceedings.