PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 21:17:47

Qwen 3.7 Max fails to impress user, matches MiMo v2.5 Pro performance

A user found that Qwen 3.7 Max did not meet their expectations, performing similarly to MiMo v2.5 Pro but at a higher cost. They noted that their specific AI applications and context tools function optimally with less verbose models. Further tuning might be necessary for Qwen to better suit these use cases. AI

IMPACT This user's experience suggests that model verbosity and cost-effectiveness remain key considerations for practical AI application.

RANK_REASON User opinion on a model release.

Read on Mastodon — fosstodon.org →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

COVERAGE [1]

  1. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    So far Qwen 3.7 Max doesn’t convince me. It costs more than MiMo v2.5 Pro and delivers the same. My use cases and AI context tools work best with less verbose m

    So far Qwen 3.7 Max doesn’t convince me. It costs more than MiMo v2.5 Pro and delivers the same. My use cases and AI context tools work best with less verbose models. Maybe Qwen needs more tuning # Qwen37Max # ai