AI feedback boosts preprint revisions and LLM tool adoption

A large-scale randomized field experiment involving over 31,000 arXiv preprints and 45,000 researchers demonstrated that AI-generated feedback significantly increases manuscript revisions. Authors receiving AI feedback were 12.55% more likely to revise their work and subsequently increased their use of LLM tools in future papers. The positive effects were most pronounced for authors from non-English-dominant regions, less established manuscripts, and early-career researchers, suggesting AI can democratize access to scientific critique. AI

IMPACT AI feedback can democratize scientific critique, boosting productivity and equity for researchers globally.

RANK_REASON The cluster contains an academic paper detailing a large-scale randomized field experiment on the impact of AI feedback on scientific research. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

• arXiv
• LLM
• researchers

• paper
• product
• other

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →