PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 10:35:58
research · [2 sources] ·

Optimizer choice dramatically alters Transformer scaling laws, research finds

A new research paper demonstrates that the choice of optimizer significantly impacts a Transformer model's capacity and scaling laws, even when the architecture remains identical. The study found that the Muon optimizer achieved linear scaling in representation capacity, a 2.3x improvement over AdamW's weaker scaling, particularly in challenging rare-token regimes. This suggests that optimizers should be considered a primary factor in model scaling, alongside architecture and data, and highlights the potential for co-designing optimizers and architectures for better performance. AI

Summary written by gemini-2.5-flash-lite from 2 sources. How we write summaries →

IMPACT Highlights that optimizer choice is a critical, under-explored factor in achieving optimal model scaling and representation capacity.

RANK_REASON The cluster contains an academic paper detailing novel research findings on model training.

Read on Hugging Face Daily Papers →

COVERAGE [2]

  1. arXiv cs.LG TIER_1 · Nandan Kumar Jha, Brandon Reagen ·

    Same Architecture, Different Capacity: Optimizer-Induced Spectral Scaling Laws

    arXiv:2605.21803v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scaling laws have made language-model performance predictable from model size, data, and compute, but they typically treat the optimizer as a fixed training detail. We show that this assumption misses a fundamental axis of represent…

  2. Hugging Face Daily Papers TIER_1 ·

    Same Architecture, Different Capacity: Optimizer-Induced Spectral Scaling Laws

    Different optimizers produce distinct spectral scaling behaviors in Transformer models, with Muon achieving superior scaling efficiency compared to AdamW in representation capacity utilization.