The author argues that society's engagement with AI is limited to discussing implementation details and ethics, rather than having a genuine say in whether AI should be integrated into critical infrastructures. This approach, they contend, creates narratives that legitimize AI's inevitability, effectively removing the option to refuse its adoption. The piece suggests that this lack of true consent and the focus on "best practices" rather than fundamental questions of adoption mirrors a form of control. AI
Summary written by gemini-2.5-flash-lite from 1 source. How we write summaries →
RANK_REASON Opinion piece by a named individual on a credible platform discussing AI's societal impact.