Users of the Cursor IDE are discussing the cost and availability of Anthropic's Claude 4.7 Opus model. Some users are concerned about exceeding their pro plan credits when using the high-thinking version for tasks like generating project plans. Others are experiencing high demand and temporary unavailability of the Opus model within Cursor, leading to questions about workarounds and how Cursor's auto-model selection functions. Despite potential token consumption, some users report significant productivity gains, completing multi-day tasks in a fraction of the time, which they argue justifies the cost. AI
Summary written by gemini-2.5-flash-lite from 3 sources. How we write summaries →
IMPACT Users are evaluating the cost-effectiveness and performance of advanced AI models within their development workflows.
RANK_REASON User discussions about a specific model's cost and availability within a third-party tool.