A new paper explores evaluation protocols for historical script classification, highlighting the significant impact of manuscript-level leakage on accuracy metrics. Researchers found that testing on pages from training manuscripts drastically inflates perceived accuracy, with a drop from 97% to 54% when moving from page-level to manuscript-level splits. The study also investigated the role of soft labels and confidence calibration, suggesting that while soft labels may not improve accuracy, they can lead to predicted distributions closer to expert assessments and reduce divergence from expert evaluations. AI
IMPACT Highlights critical considerations for evaluating AI models in specialized domains, particularly concerning data leakage and confidence calibration.
RANK_REASON Academic paper detailing evaluation protocols and findings for a specific AI task. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- alphaXiv
- CatalyzeX
- Connected Papers
- DagsHub
- Gotit.pub
- Hugging Face
- Litmaps
- ResNet18
- ScienceCast
- scite Smart Citations
- VML-HP-ext
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →