Using generative AI artwork to represent a website, instance, or project is likely a poor choice. The prevalence of AI-generated content online can lead users to associate such art with low-quality or unoriginal information, potentially damaging the perception of the project. The author suggests opting for human-created art, possibly from creative commons sources, if budget constraints prevent hiring an artist. AI
IMPACT Suggests that using AI-generated art for project representation may negatively impact user perception due to associations with low-quality content.
RANK_REASON Opinion piece from a social media user about the use of AI-generated art.
Read on Mastodon — mastodon.social →
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →