A new study on arXiv compares the effectiveness of large language model (LLM)-based agents against traditional search tools for collaborative information seeking. The research involved 80 students working in pairs on four tasks, evaluating scenarios with a QAAgent, a CoSearchAgent, a search plugin, and manual Google Search. Results indicate that LLM agents reduce perceived workload, enhance collaboration, and alter communication and evidence-use patterns, though they may lead to less rich reports due to increased paraphrasing. AI
IMPACT LLM agents show potential to streamline collaborative research and alter information-seeking behaviors.
RANK_REASON The item is an academic paper detailing an empirical study on LLM agents for collaborative search. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Read on arXiv cs.IR (Information Retrieval) →
- alphaXiv
- arXiv
- CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
- Connected Papers
- CORE Recommender
- CoSearchAgent
- DagsHub
- Google Search
- Gotit.pub
- Hugging Face
- Influence Flower
- large-language models
- Litmaps
- QAAgent
- ScienceCast
- scite Smart Citations
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →