New framework decomposes LLM prediction risk into specification, aleatoric, and epistemic uncertainties

Researchers have introduced a novel three-term decomposition of prediction risk for large language models, distinguishing between specification, residual aleatoric, and epistemic uncertainties. This framework addresses scenarios where users can clarify underspecified inputs without retraining the model, thereby improving prediction accuracy. The proposed decomposition helps identify when requesting clarification is beneficial, with specification uncertainty being key for detecting ambiguous inputs and residual aleatoric uncertainty for in-distribution errors. AI

IMPACT Introduces a new theoretical framework for understanding and decomposing uncertainty in large language models, potentially improving their reliability and interpretability.

RANK_REASON The item is an academic paper published on arXiv detailing a new theoretical framework for understanding uncertainty in large language models. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.CL →

• alphaXiv
• arXiv
• Bayes risk weighted vector quantization with posterior estimation for image compression and classification
• CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
• Connected Papers
• CORE Recommender
• DagsHub
• epistemic uncertainty
• Gotit.pub
• Hugging Face
• Influence Flower
• large-language models
• Litmaps
• residual aleatoric uncertainty
• ScienceCast
• scite Smart Citations
• Specification-Aware Predictive Uncertainty Decomposition
• Specification Uncertainty and Model Averaging

• paper
• model release

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →