A new paper investigates the performance of the Muon optimizer compared to AdamW in large language model pretraining. While Muon initially shows speed advantages, the research reveals that AdamW outperforms Muon after fine-tuning, particularly with larger pretraining datasets. This reversal is explained by the margin-to-spread ratio, which indicates that AdamW becomes more effective as the data budget increases. AI
IMPACT Suggests that AdamW may be a more robust choice than Muon for LLM fine-tuning, especially with extensive pretraining data.
RANK_REASON Research paper analyzing optimizer performance in LLM pretraining and fine-tuning. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Read on Hugging Face Daily Papers →
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →