A recent analysis of the Hugging Face leaderboard for "Humanity's Last Exam" (HLE) reveals that most top-performing models are utilizing external tools, a factor not explicitly tracked by the leaderboard. Out of the top 24 rows, 21 explicitly state they used tools, with three unlabeled rows also confirmed to be using tools based on their model cards. The use of tools significantly boosts scores, adding between 7.8 to 15.1 points, which is a substantial margin compared to the test's inherent noise. The first model explicitly reporting a "no tools" score ranks 25th, highlighting the impact of tool augmentation on performance. AI
IMPACT Highlights the significant performance advantage of tool-augmented LLMs, suggesting current benchmarks may not accurately reflect closed-book capabilities.
RANK_REASON Analysis of a benchmark leaderboard and its methodology. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →