A recent test evaluated eight large language models on their ability to accurately recall football (soccer) player career data, specifically the clubs they played for. The models were prompted to provide this information in a JSON format, with a specific instruction to decline if unsure. However, most models attempted to answer even for less famous players, leading to a high rate of inaccuracies. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash demonstrated the highest accuracy but was significantly slower, while GPT-5.4 mini was faster and named more clubs but with lower precision. Claude Haiku 4.5 declined the most players but still provided many incorrect club associations. AI
IMPACT Highlights LLM limitations in factual recall and the need for careful prompting and verification, especially for niche data.
RANK_REASON LLM evaluation on a specific knowledge domain. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- Anthropic
- Claude Haiku 4.5
- Cologne
- DeepSeek
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DigitalOcean
- Fabio Grosso
- FC Dinamo Bucharest
- GPT-5.4 mini
- Inter Milan
- Meta
- Mistral AI
- OpenAI
- Teddy Sheringham
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →