A new study titled "How Stable Are LLM-Generated Proofs Under Program Refactoring?" introduces RefactorProof, a benchmark designed to test the resilience of code generation proofs after program refactoring. The benchmark comprises 458 Lean-certified variants derived from 185 VERINA tasks, maintaining the original specification and proof. Results indicate significant brittleness in proofs generated by both reference systems and specialized LLM provers, with failure rates ranging from 4.3% to 26.8%. Despite this, the specialized provers demonstrated higher stability than reference proofs, with DeepSeek-Prover-V2-7B, Goedel-Prover-V2-32B, and Goedel-Prover-V2-8B showing improved unchanged-proof survival rates. AI
IMPACT Highlights the need for more robust LLM-generated code proofs that can withstand program refactoring, impacting the reliability of AI-assisted software development.
RANK_REASON The cluster contains an academic paper detailing a new benchmark and experimental results for LLM-generated code proofs. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- arXiv
- DeepSeek-Prover-V2-7B
- Goedel-Prover-V2-32B
- Goedel-Prover-V2-8B
- Hugging Face
- Lean
- RefactorProof
- VERINA
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →