LLM-generated articles can perpetuate errors, new arXiv study finds

A new research paper published on arXiv explores how errors can persist and spread within information ecosystems mediated by large language models (LLMs). The study found that even when LLMs avoid explicitly endorsing false claims, the detailed information within their generated articles can still be reproduced by subsequent models. This "error persistence" was observed to increase the presence of complete false claims while decreasing explicit endorsements. The research suggests that the information supplied by LLM-generated publications plays a crucial role in the propagation of errors, highlighting the need to evaluate not only what models affirm but also what they contribute to future information cycles. AI

IMPACT Highlights the risk of LLM-generated content inadvertently spreading misinformation, impacting the reliability of online information ecosystems.

RANK_REASON Research paper published on arXiv detailing findings about LLM error persistence. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv cs.AI →

• alphaXiv
• artificial intelligence
• arXiv
• arXivLabs
• CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
• computer science
• CORE Recommender
• DagsHub
• Gotit.pub
• Hugging Face
• Influence Flower
• large-language models
• ScienceCast

• paper
• safety

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →