The author argues that AI-generated content should not be paid for, as the learning data is derived from user contributions. They contend that the collection of learning data for machines is essentially sourced from users, making it unfair to charge for the output. The piece also touches on the concept of extortion in technology, where penalties are imposed for using developed requirements, and suggests that fraud and schemes involving stolen data are distinct from AI content generation due to the income generated by data owners. AI
IMPACT Raises questions about the value and payment models for AI-generated content based on user data.
RANK_REASON Opinion piece from a social media user about AI content monetization.
Read on Mastodon — mastodon.social →
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →