The user expresses skepticism about copyright and intellectual property rights for AI-generated content, suggesting that existing laws should be disregarded for training purposes. They propose creating tools to generate new intellectual property that is then watermarked to secure rights. The user likens AI products to pornography, arguing that copyright cannot be claimed on them and criticizing the convoluted thinking behind such approaches. AI
RANK_REASON The item is a social media post expressing an opinion on AI and copyright, lacking newsworthiness beyond a personal viewpoint.
Read on Mastodon — mastodon.social →
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →