This paper introduces a new approach to building scholarly knowledge graphs by addressing the complexities of source attribution and comparability. It proposes distinguishing between a working address for evidence retrieval, a source-defined category, and the decision to admit a passage for comparison. The authors demonstrate this method with the PaRAGraph Casebook on four re-runnable cases, showing how language models extract and verify claims. The system stores these decisions as objects, fixing the path from comparison to evidence while allowing the taxonomy to be revised with new sources. AI
IMPACT Introduces a framework for more robust and verifiable scholarly knowledge graphs, potentially improving AI-driven research synthesis.
RANK_REASON This is a research paper published on arXiv detailing a novel methodology for constructing scholarly knowledge graphs. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- alphaXiv
- CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
- comparability
- Connected Papers
- DagsHub
- Gotit.pub
- Hugging Face
- Influence Flower
- knowledge graph
- language model
- Litmaps
- PaRAGraph Casebook
- ScienceCast
- scite Smart Citations
- Sinitic dialectology
- source attribution
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →