A new paper from arXiv explores the distinction between elicitation and expansion in agent harness optimization for language models. The research analyzes whether optimized harnesses improve performance on tasks already within reach (elicitation) or broaden the range of solvable tasks (expansion). The study found that while harness optimization can yield significant gains, these advantages can diminish with larger attempt budgets and may mask shortfalls on more difficult tasks, highlighting the need for detailed diagnostic analysis. AI
IMPACT This research could refine how language model agents are optimized, potentially leading to more efficient capability improvements and better understanding of their performance gains.
RANK_REASON The cluster contains a single academic paper published on arXiv. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- alphaXiv
- arXiv
- Bibliographic Explorer
- CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
- Connected Papers
- CORE Recommender
- DagsHub
- Elicitation or Expansion? Demystifying Gains from Agent Harness Optimization
- Gotit.pub
- harness optimization
- Hugging Face
- Influence Flower
- language-model agents
- Litmaps
- Pass@1
- pass@k
- reinforcement learning
- ScienceCast
- scite Smart Citations
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →