PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 11:05:33

Anthropic's Claude 5.5 models offer tiered pricing and capabilities

Anthropic has released a suite of Claude 5.5 models, including Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, and Haiku 5.5, all featuring a 1 million token context window and up to 128K tokens of output. While these models share core capabilities, their pricing varies significantly, with Fable 5.1 being the most expensive and Haiku 5.5 the most economical. Comparative analyses suggest that for many tasks, particularly coding, the less expensive Sonnet 5.5 model performs comparably to the higher-priced Opus 5.5, making it a more cost-effective choice for high-volume or general use. AI

IMPACT The tiered pricing and performance of the Claude 5.5 models allow users to select the most cost-effective option for their specific needs, potentially optimizing AI operational budgets.

RANK_REASON Multiple sources detail Anthropic's release of new Claude 5.5 models with tiered capabilities and pricing.

Read on Medium — Claude tag →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 5 sources. How we write summaries →

Anthropic's Claude 5.5 models offer tiered pricing and capabilities

How we ranked this

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Frontier Release
Multiple sources detail Anthropic's release of new Claude 5.5 models with tiered capabilities and pricing.
Source corroboration
5 independent sources
Strong cross-source corroboration — multiple independent publishers covered this within the clustering window.
Topics
model release, product
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
14 days old
Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

Full methodology in our editorial standards.

COVERAGE [5]

  1. Medium — Claude tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Yashraj Behera ·

    Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Opus 5.5, and when the cheaper model costs more

    <div class="medium-feed-item"><p class="medium-feed-image"><a href="https://generativeai.pub/claude-sonnet-5-5-vs-opus-5-5-and-when-the-cheaper-model-costs-more-5c2de8ff64a4?source=rss------claude-5"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1376/1*BkbVfIE1McKzAee6_8EA8A.jpeg…

  2. Medium — Claude tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Nick Babich ·

    Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5 vs Opus 5.5: Which Model Should You Use for Which Task?

    <div class="medium-feed-item"><p class="medium-feed-image"><a href="https://uxplanet.org/claude-haiku-5-5-vs-sonnet-5-5-vs-opus-5-5-which-model-should-you-use-for-which-task-558e2b26cb3c?source=rss------claude-5"><img src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1935/1*WZSvdjeGCkQaQA…

  3. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Saurabh Bhayana ·

    Claude Models in 2026: Fable 5.1 vs Opus 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5 vs Haiku 5.5 (Pricing and Which to Use)

    <p><em>This guide was first published on <a href="https://saurabhbhayana.com/claude-ai-models-guide-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">saurabhbhayana.com</a>.</em></p> <p>The most expensive Claude model costs 100 times more per input token than the cheapest one. Most people who buil…

  4. dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · xiun xiao ·

    Claude Opus 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5 for coding agents: is Opus worth it?

    <p><em>Originally published on the <a href="https://quicksilverpro.io/blog/claude-opus-5-5-vs-sonnet-5-5-coding/?utm_source=devto&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=opus-vs-sonnet" rel="noopener noreferrer">QuickSilver Pro blog</a>.</em></p> <p>Claude Opus 5.5 costs $1.00 /…

  5. r/cursor TIER_2 Norsk(NO) · /u/Jbro2468 ·

    Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.7

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>If you had to use either (or a combo of both), which would you use for coding tasks and feature work?</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Jbro2468"> /u/Jbro2468 </a> <br /> <span><a href="https:/…