A new benchmark called Realtime-Bench has been developed to evaluate the ability of frontier AI models to perform tasks in real-time interactive environments. The benchmark includes dynamic tasks where delayed actions negatively impact success rates. Experiments using Realtime-Bench showed that even the best models achieved only a 44% success rate under a 'Wall Clock' setting, which accounts for actual inference latency. The benchmark also introduces 'Paused Clock' and 'Token Clock' to differentiate between serving latency and the model's intrinsic real-time streaming capability, revealing a trade-off between decision quality and timely execution under time pressure. AI
IMPACT Highlights the challenge for AI models in real-time interactive tasks and suggests directions for improving temporal awareness and adaptive reasoning.
RANK_REASON The item is a research paper introducing a new benchmark for evaluating AI models. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
- alphaXiv
- arXiv
- CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
- Connected Papers
- CORE Recommender
- DagsHub
- Gotit.pub
- Hugging Face
- Litmaps
- Paused Clock
- Realtime-Bench
- ScienceCast
- scite Smart Citations
- Token Clock
- Wall Clock
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →