A new study published on arXiv explores two architectures for tool discovery in LLM agents: Retrieve-then-Plan (RtP) and Plan-then-Retrieve (PtR). The research found that RtP is more effective for single-tool queries, while PtR excels with multi-tool queries, with a complexity-dependent crossover point. This finding holds across various retrieval budgets, registry sizes, and model families like Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-OSS 120B. The study also identified a 'stub-hallucination' failure mode in PtR and noted that PtR roughly doubles inference costs, making complexity-adaptive routing a promising direction. AI
IMPACT This research offers insights into optimizing LLM agent performance by adapting tool discovery strategies based on query complexity.
RANK_REASON The cluster contains a research paper detailing a study on LLM agent architectures. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Read on arXiv cs.IR (Information Retrieval) →
- alphaXiv
- arXiv
- CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
- DagsHub
- Gemini 2.5 Flash
- Gotit.pub
- GPT-OSS 120B
- Hugging Face
- Plan-then-Retrieve
- Retrieve-then-Plan
- ScienceCast
- ToolBench
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →