New research quantifies noise in LLM evaluations

A new paper on arXiv introduces a method to measure the various sources of noise in Large Language Model (LLM) evaluations. The research identifies three types of noise: prediction noise from varied model outputs, data noise from question sampling, and their combined total noise. To improve statistical power and relative comparisons, the authors propose an 'all-pairs comparison' approach that analyzes millions of predictions across numerous evaluations. AI

IMPACT Provides a framework for more statistically robust LLM evaluation, potentially leading to more reliable model comparisons.

RANK_REASON Academic paper published on arXiv detailing a new methodology for evaluating LLMs. [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

Read on arXiv stat.ML →

• alphaXiv
• arXiv
• CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers
• CORE Recommender
• DagsHub
• Gotit.pub
• Hugging Face
• IArxiv Recommender
• Influence Flower
• LLM Evals
• ScienceCast
• Sida I. Wang

• paper
• other

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →