A recent experiment with Claude Code 2.1.289 and the Opus 5.5 model revealed that the system's skill description budget is 1% of the context window, not the 2% previously stated in documentation. When this budget is exceeded, Claude Code drops descriptions of less frequently invoked skills, impacting the model's ability to autonomously select them. The experiment found that while skill names are retained, the model failed to invoke skills that only had their names listed, contrasting with its success rate for skills with descriptions. AI
IMPACT Clarifies limitations in Claude Code's skill invocation, potentially affecting developer workflows and model autonomy.
RANK_REASON Analysis of a specific product's behavior and documentation discrepancies.
Read on dev.to — Claude Code tag →
AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →